Recent Successes Article
'Little green man' murder case ends in acquittal
By Ihosvani Rodriguez
San Antonio Express-News
Web Posted: 12/18/2003 12:00 AM
A little green man may have been a figment of Raymond
Rodriguez's drug-fueled imagination, but it was possibly real
enough for a jury to clear him Wednesday of capital murder.
Jurors rejected prosecutors' claims that Rodriquez stabbed his
mother's longtime drinking partner and lover, Danny San Miguel,
77, nearly three years ago to steal his truck.
For nearly three weeks, defense attorneys Anthony Cantrell and
Tina Tussay-Cooper zealously attacked that notion from different
fronts, including saying their client was rendered temporarily
insane by a page-size sheet of LSD he was forced to gobble up on
the night San Miguel was killed.
The jurors deliberated for five hours and left the courthouse
declining to speak to attorneys or reporters, leaving everyone
to speculate on their decision.
"I think the jury saw that he was railroaded by everyone from
the very beginning, " Tussay-Cooper said.
Rodriguez, who has been in jail for almost two years awaiting
trail, was facing a possible life sentence if convicted of
capital murder.
During the trial, Rodriguez claimed a junkie forced him to
swallow LSD when they were pulled over by police on Feb. 5,
2001. When Rodriquez got home, he said he was hallucinating.
Among his visions was a tiny green man who jumped at him from
behind a pint of ice cream. The figure taunted Rodriguez to kill
him. Rodriquez then claims he blacked out.
The next morning, he woke up lying on San Miguel, who a knife
impaled in his chest.
Attorneys suggested someone else in the house killed San Miguel,
then manipulated Rodriguez into believing he did it. Rodriquez's
attorneys portrayed their client throughout the trial as having
mental retardation.
Prosecutors ridiculed the insanity defense. They repeatedly
highlighted how Rodriguez remembered details about disposing of
San Miguel's body the next morning.
Assistant District Attorney David Lunan said he was disappointed
by the verdict and feared that the jury's decision could lead
others to abuse the temporary insanity defense.
|